Silicon ChipTechno Talk - December 2020 SILICON CHIP
  1. Outer Front Cover
  2. Contents
  3. Subscriptions: PE Subscription
  4. Subscriptions: PicoLog Cloud
  5. Back Issues: PICOLOG
  6. Publisher's Letter
  7. Feature: The Fox Report by Barry Fox
  8. Feature: Techno Talk by Mark Nelson
  9. Feature: Net Work by Alan Winstanley
  10. Project: Clever Controller for a Dumb Battery Charger by JOHN CLARKE
  11. Project: LFSR Random Number Generator Using Logic ICs by Tim Blythman
  12. Project: HIGH-POWER 45V/8A VARIABLE LINEAR SUPPLY by Tim Blythman
  13. Feature: Building a Hi-Fi amp on the cheap by Julian Edgar
  14. Feature: AUDIO OUT by Jake Rothman
  15. Feature: Make it with Micromite by Phil Boyce
  16. Feature: Circuit Surgery by IAN BELL
  17. Feature: Max’s Cool Beans by Max the Magnificent
  18. PCB Order Form: Max’s Cool Beans by Max the Magnificent
  19. Advertising Index: Electronic Building Blocks by Julian Edgar

This is only a preview of the December 2020 issue of Practical Electronics.

You can view 0 of the 72 pages in the full issue.

Articles in this series:
  • (November 2020)
  • Techno Talk (December 2020)
  • Techno Talk (January 2021)
  • Techno Talk (February 2021)
  • Techno Talk (March 2021)
  • Techno Talk (April 2021)
  • Techno Talk (May 2021)
  • Techno Talk (June 2021)
  • Techno Talk (July 2021)
  • Techno Talk (August 2021)
  • Techno Talk (September 2021)
  • Techno Talk (October 2021)
  • Techno Talk (November 2021)
  • Techno Talk (December 2021)
  • Communing with nature (January 2022)
  • Should we be worried? (February 2022)
  • How resilient is your lifeline? (March 2022)
  • Go eco, get ethical! (April 2022)
  • From nano to bio (May 2022)
  • Positivity follows the gloom (June 2022)
  • Mixed menu (July 2022)
  • Time for a total rethink? (August 2022)
  • What’s in a name? (September 2022)
  • Forget leaves on the line! (October 2022)
  • Giant Boost for Batteries (December 2022)
  • Raudive Voices Revisited (January 2023)
  • A thousand words (February 2023)
  • It’s handover time (March 2023)
  • AI, Robots, Horticulture and Agriculture (April 2023)
  • Prophecy can be perplexing (May 2023)
  • Technology comes in different shapes and sizes (June 2023)
  • AI and robots – what could possibly go wrong? (July 2023)
  • How long until we’re all out of work? (August 2023)
  • We both have truths, are mine the same as yours? (September 2023)
  • Holy Spheres, Batman! (October 2023)
  • Where’s my pneumatic car? (November 2023)
  • Good grief! (December 2023)
  • Cheeky chiplets (January 2024)
  • Cheeky chiplets (February 2024)
  • The Wibbly-Wobbly World of Quantum (March 2024)
  • Techno Talk - Wait! What? Really? (April 2024)
  • Techno Talk - One step closer to a dystopian abyss? (May 2024)
  • Techno Talk - Program that! (June 2024)
  • Techno Talk (July 2024)
  • Techno Talk - That makes so much sense! (August 2024)
  • Techno Talk - I don’t want to be a Norbert... (September 2024)
  • Techno Talk - Sticking the landing (October 2024)
  • Techno Talk (November 2024)
  • Techno Talk (December 2024)
  • Techno Talk (January 2025)
  • Techno Talk (February 2025)
  • Techno Talk (March 2025)
  • Techno Talk (April 2025)
  • Techno Talk (May 2025)
  • Techno Talk (June 2025)
Triumph or travesty? Techno Talk Mark Nelson Spoiler alert: This article revolves around a minor news story published in late September this year. Even then, it was not headline news, and was soon forgotten. It does, however, involve practical electronics, with implications that are broader than you might imagine, calling into question the competence of Britain’s leading broadband infrastructure provider. Am I over-reacting? Read on and see what you think. O ne of the first things that reporters and media relations people are taught during training is that today’s news stories will be wrapping fish suppers tomorrow. Old news is soon forgotten, and for people and organisations castigated in those stories, this is no bad thing if unwelcome news can be buried rapidly. Another lesson taught early on is that when you’re in a hole, you stop digging. And you certainly don’t shout about your predicament. Despite these truisms, on 22 September, BT Openreach’s press office announced that its most experienced engineers had taken 18 months to solve a mystery fault that had plagued the broadband connections of residents living in a rural village in mid-Wales. Openreach gushed: ‘For months the inhabitants of Aberhosan – along with some neighbouring communities – have endured poor broadband connectivity and slow speeds every morning at 7am, despite repeated visits by engineers to fix the fault. Frequent tests proved that the network was working fine and local engineers even replaced large sections of cable that served the village, but the problems remained.’ – see: http://bit.ly/pe-dec20-open World-class service in action? Excuse me, is Openreach – which boasts on its website of providing world-class customer service – really unable to clear a fault in under 18 months? Evidently so. Yet, the company’s website also declares, ‘Data is such an essential part of consumers’ lives they have high expectations when it comes to service. To make sure Openreach can meet them, we have quality of service standards – values we measure ourselves against to track how we’re performing.’ That the company considers taking 18 months to clear a fault as a matter for self-congratulation strikes me as, well, risible. After studying 20 different reports on this farrago, I can only say that not one of them stacks up. The Openreach version simply spouts waffle about a maladjusted television receiver without explaining how a short burst of 10 electrical interference can block ADSL broadband service throughout a whole village as well as at properties outside the village. The broadband technology in use must be pretty feeble if is so poorly shielded against a burst of interference. Of course, none of the media reports describes how long the trouble persisted each day. Given that the problem recurred every day at the same time, presumably the outage was only temporary and cleared itself rapidly, in good time for the same problem to recur the next day. Mains-borne interference? Openreach finally traced the source of the interference to an ‘old’ television receiver, but given that mid-Wales was converted from analogue to digital television in 2010, the oldest tellies in use there cannot be more than ten years old. So how can an ancient TV still be in use if it’s an old analogue UHF set (unless the viewer is using a Freeview box to convert digital to analogue). In that unlikely case, it is indeed possible that the television’s power supply might have caused mains-borne interference from the TV’s power supply. The Philips G8 model of the 1970s, for example, was notorious for radiating nasty 25Hz ‘hash’ over wide areas. But are we really suggesting that this noisy telly was adjacent to the village distribution cabinet and was fed from the same supply feed and phase? If so, perhaps Openreach should fit better mains filtering on incoming mains feeds – and provide earthed screening inside their cabinets. In any case, as a forum poster at Digital Spy (http://bit.ly/pe-dec20-dspy) points out, Openreach could have looked at the DSLAM logs, to see exactly when the lines were affected with loss of (or reduced) sync. The same thread states that ITV Evening News had interviewed villagers who said their broadband was still misbehaving – and that if anything, it had actually got worse! One of them added that the outage occurred even when the owners of the unruly telly were away on holiday – spooky or what?! Precise explanation Openreach identified the fault as ‘a phenomenon known as SHINE (single high-level impulse noise) where electrical interference is omitted from an appliance that can then have an impact on broadband connectivity’. Someone at Openreach clearly doesn’t know the precise difference between ‘omitted’ and ‘emitted’! The Zen Internet website explains more precisely that SHINE occurs when interference is generated as a burst – for example, when a device is powered on or off. As a result, disconnections or line errors may result at the time a device is switched on or off. Incidentally, there is another kind of interference affecting broadband called REIN (repetitive electrical impulse noise), which, as the name suggests, occurs persistently. This will typically result in disconnections or line errors while the interfering electrical device is in use and at worst, may prevent any connection being established at all. In either case, come REIN or come SHINE, broadband users are likely to see persistently slower data speeds while the automated systems work to mitigate the interference by throttling back the maximum connection speed. Good news and bad The best comment was on the Hackaday. com website: ‘We’ll say one thing for the good people of Aberhosan: they must be patient in the extreme to put up with daily Internet outages for 18 months.’ And as a reward, Aberhosan residents will soon be connected to fibre, as part of Openreach’s work with the Welsh Government to further expand the fibre broadband network in rural Wales. Meanwhile, in other news the UK is now among the slowest countries in Europe for broadband download speeds. Analysis and advice organisation www. cable.co.uk reports that with an average (mean) broadband download speed of 37.82Mbit/s, the UK comes 22nd out of 29 western European countries. In global terms the UK comes 47th, against 34th last year. Nothing to be proud of. Practical Electronics | December | 2020