Silicon ChipTechnology comes in different shapes and sizes - June 2023 SILICON CHIP
  1. Outer Front Cover
  2. Contents
  3. Subscriptions: PE Subscription
  4. Subscriptions
  5. Back Issues: Hare & Forbes Machineryhouse
  6. Publisher's Letter: Powerful projects
  7. Feature: Technology comes in different shapes and sizes by Max the Magnificent
  8. Feature: Net Work by Alan Winstanley
  9. Project: Arduino Programmable Load by Tim Blythman
  10. Project: 500 WATTS POWER AMPLIFIER by JOHN CLARKE
  11. Project: High-Power Buck-Boost LED Driver by Tim Blythmhman
  12. Feature: CJMCU-7620 Gesture Recognition Module by Jim Rowe
  13. Feature: Max’s Cool Beans by Max the Magnificent
  14. Feature: Circuit Surgery by Ian Bell
  15. Feature: Make it with Micromite by Phil Boyce
  16. Feature: AUDIO OUT by Jake Rothman
  17. Feature: PE hands-on product review by Julian Edgar
  18. PCB Order Form
  19. Advertising Index

This is only a preview of the June 2023 issue of Practical Electronics.

You can view 0 of the 72 pages in the full issue.

Articles in this series:
  • (November 2020)
  • Techno Talk (December 2020)
  • Techno Talk (January 2021)
  • Techno Talk (February 2021)
  • Techno Talk (March 2021)
  • Techno Talk (April 2021)
  • Techno Talk (May 2021)
  • Techno Talk (June 2021)
  • Techno Talk (July 2021)
  • Techno Talk (August 2021)
  • Techno Talk (September 2021)
  • Techno Talk (October 2021)
  • Techno Talk (November 2021)
  • Techno Talk (December 2021)
  • Communing with nature (January 2022)
  • Should we be worried? (February 2022)
  • How resilient is your lifeline? (March 2022)
  • Go eco, get ethical! (April 2022)
  • From nano to bio (May 2022)
  • Positivity follows the gloom (June 2022)
  • Mixed menu (July 2022)
  • Time for a total rethink? (August 2022)
  • What’s in a name? (September 2022)
  • Forget leaves on the line! (October 2022)
  • Giant Boost for Batteries (December 2022)
  • Raudive Voices Revisited (January 2023)
  • A thousand words (February 2023)
  • It’s handover time (March 2023)
  • AI, Robots, Horticulture and Agriculture (April 2023)
  • Prophecy can be perplexing (May 2023)
  • Technology comes in different shapes and sizes (June 2023)
  • AI and robots – what could possibly go wrong? (July 2023)
  • How long until we’re all out of work? (August 2023)
  • We both have truths, are mine the same as yours? (September 2023)
  • Holy Spheres, Batman! (October 2023)
  • Where’s my pneumatic car? (November 2023)
  • Good grief! (December 2023)
  • Cheeky chiplets (January 2024)
  • Cheeky chiplets (February 2024)
  • The Wibbly-Wobbly World of Quantum (March 2024)
  • Techno Talk - Wait! What? Really? (April 2024)
  • Techno Talk - One step closer to a dystopian abyss? (May 2024)
  • Techno Talk - Program that! (June 2024)
  • Techno Talk (July 2024)
  • Techno Talk - That makes so much sense! (August 2024)
  • Techno Talk - I don’t want to be a Norbert... (September 2024)
  • Techno Talk - Sticking the landing (October 2024)
  • Techno Talk (November 2024)
  • Techno Talk (December 2024)
  • Techno Talk (January 2025)
  • Techno Talk (February 2025)
  • Techno Talk (March 2025)
  • Techno Talk (April 2025)
  • Techno Talk (May 2025)
  • Techno Talk (June 2025)
Techno Talk Technology comes in different shapes and sizes Max the Magnificent What constitutes high versus low tech evolves over time. Can you conceive the confused conjectures that could have commenced if a band of Stone Age wanderers stumbled across a time traveler’s cache of glass marbles, for example? T hese days, we’re accustomed to hearing the term ‘high tech,’ short for ‘high technology,’ but what does this actually mean? In fact, this phrase, which may also be referred to as ‘advanced technology’ (‘advanced tech’) or ‘exotechnology’ essentially means the highest form of technology currently available. It can also be defined as either the most complex technology obtainable or the newest technology on the market. The obvious opposite to high tech would be ‘low tech,’ but this is a bit harder to pin down (and don’t get me started on big tech, small tech, retro tech, slow tech, and wild tech). Some people regard low tech as referring to pre-industrial revolution machines like windmills and sailboats. More generally, the Cambridge International Dictionary of English defines low tech as a technology that is ‘not recent or uses old materials.’ A more nuanced definition of low tech extends to new, future-oriented techniques that are more environmentally and ecologically sensitive. For the engineer in me, it’s tempting to categorise low tech as referring to simple, traditional, mechanical technologies. On this basis, we might class slide rules as being low-tech calculating devices, which isn’t to say that they aren’t incredibly clever. From another perspective, today’s high tech is tomorrow’s low tech. When vacuumtube-based electronic devices like radios first appeared on the market in the early 1900s, they would have been classed as high tech (well, maybe not, because the ‘high tech’ nomenclature wasn’t coined until a 1958 column in The New York Times), but most of us would now class these cunning contraptions as falling into the ‘low tech’ category. That’s nuts! The reason I’m currently cogitating on this topic has its origin in the mid-1980s when the small company I was working for designed a hardware accelerator for UNIX computers. This was a box around the size of a small UK refrigerator that sat next to the main UNIX machine. Our 8 accelerator could offload the main machine and speed some applications by one or two orders of magnitude. Eventually, we sent our masterpiece off to a special laboratory to have it tested for its resiliency to vibration and shock, and to be certified for use in industrial environments. It failed. According to the report, the accelerator was DOA (dead on arrival). On its way to the lab, the machine nuts attaching the top-mounted cooling fan had vibrated loose, allowing the fan to fall into the guts (well, brains) of the machine. Suffice it to say that we ended up wearing our sad faces that day. This all came flooding back to me when I ran across a nice video about something called Nord-lock washers (https://bit.ly/3zXrxcZ). Prior to seeing this little scamp, I would have classed machine screws and nuts and washers as being low tech. All I can say is that I now look at washer technology with new respect. I haven’t felt this excited since I was introduced to the concept of a one-way Tesla valve that allows water (or another fluid) to flow one way and blocks it from flowing the other way, all without any moving parts – see: https://bit.ly/3GLw71F You can tell me that both these devices are low tech as much as you want, but they impress the socks off me! Losing my marbles When I was a kid, I used to enjoy playing with glass marbles. I also used to enjoy simply looking at them. Some had swirls of color, others contained small bubbles of air, and each was a delight in its own unique way. I’m sure that the machines used to create glass marbles would be classed as being low tech, and that may be true, but if you were tasked with designing a machine to make marbles, would you be up to the task? To be honest, I wouldn’t have known where to start until I ran across a very cool video that explains all: https://bit.ly/43zJbAY Triangles, tiles, and mazes (Oh my!) A few days ago, as I pen these words, I started to hear tales racing around the interweb that two high school students had come up with a new proof of the Pythagorean theorem (you know the one, a2 + b2 = c2). Initially, I was somewhat underwhelmed, but then I started to think about how I would go about generating such a proof. It didn’t take long before I wanted to learn more, so I found a video that explains all. All I can say is that Pythagoras would be proud: https://bit.ly/3MLxGAA On the one hand, you can’t get much more low tech than tiles (think ceramic tiles covering a bathroom floor). Of course, actually making tiles is a lot harder than talking about making them (I know because I have my own kiln that I’m using to make tiles for a monster mosaic, but that’s a story for another day). I just heard that an amateur mathematician has discovered a 13-sided tile that can cover a surface without ever creating a repeating pattern – see: https://cnn.it/41q1iYO The problem with YouTube is that you keep on getting sucked into metaphorical rabbit holes. For example, I also ran across a fascinating video showing how water can be used to solve a maze: https://bit.ly/41JVfOa Reinventing the wheel People say that you shouldn’t waste your time reinventing the wheel. What they fail to mention is that you may end up creating a revolutionary new rolling device. Last year I was introduced to an example where someone managed to use two half wheels to perform the task of a full one: https://bit.ly/3KORUqA More recently, I saw a video of someone sitting on what appeared to be a normal bicycle equipped with two square wheels. When the bike’s creator mounted the beast, I was expecting a painful viewing experience, but I was blown away by what I saw: https://bit.ly/3osHuW3 Amazingly, one of my friends found the perfect complementary clip from the 1964 British ‘historical’ comedy film Carry on Cleo. Make sure to watch to the very end because the last line is the corker: https://bit.ly/3otsEP7 Practical Electronics | June | 2023