Silicon ChipWhat’s in a name? - September 2022 SILICON CHIP
  1. Outer Front Cover
  2. Contents
  3. Subscriptions: PE Subscription
  4. Subscriptions
  5. Back Issues: Hare & Forbes Machineryhouse
  6. Publisher's Letter
  7. Feature: What’s in a name? by Mark Nelson
  8. Feature: The Fox Report by Barry Fox
  9. Feature: Net Work by Alan Winstanley
  10. Project: TOUCHSCREEN AND REMOTE DIGITAL PREAMP WITH TONE CONTROLS by NICHOLAS VINEN AND TIM BLYTHMAN
  11. Project: MICROMITE TO SMARTPHONE CONNECTOR VIA BLUETOOTH by TOM HARTLEY
  12. Project: 20A DC Motor Speed Controller by JOHN CLARKE
  13. Project: USB-PD Triggers, Decoys and Testers by Jim Rowe
  14. Feature: Circuit Surgery by Ian Bell
  15. Feature: Make it with Micromite by Phil Boyce
  16. Feature: Max’s Cool Beans by Max the Magnificent
  17. Feature: AUDIO OUT by Jake Rothman
  18. PCB Order Form
  19. Advertising Index

This is only a preview of the September 2022 issue of Practical Electronics.

You can view 0 of the 72 pages in the full issue.

Articles in this series:
  • (November 2020)
  • Techno Talk (December 2020)
  • Techno Talk (January 2021)
  • Techno Talk (February 2021)
  • Techno Talk (March 2021)
  • Techno Talk (April 2021)
  • Techno Talk (May 2021)
  • Techno Talk (June 2021)
  • Techno Talk (July 2021)
  • Techno Talk (August 2021)
  • Techno Talk (September 2021)
  • Techno Talk (October 2021)
  • Techno Talk (November 2021)
  • Techno Talk (December 2021)
  • Communing with nature (January 2022)
  • Should we be worried? (February 2022)
  • How resilient is your lifeline? (March 2022)
  • Go eco, get ethical! (April 2022)
  • From nano to bio (May 2022)
  • Positivity follows the gloom (June 2022)
  • Mixed menu (July 2022)
  • Time for a total rethink? (August 2022)
  • What’s in a name? (September 2022)
  • Forget leaves on the line! (October 2022)
  • Giant Boost for Batteries (December 2022)
  • Raudive Voices Revisited (January 2023)
  • A thousand words (February 2023)
  • It’s handover time (March 2023)
  • AI, Robots, Horticulture and Agriculture (April 2023)
  • Prophecy can be perplexing (May 2023)
  • Technology comes in different shapes and sizes (June 2023)
  • AI and robots – what could possibly go wrong? (July 2023)
  • How long until we’re all out of work? (August 2023)
  • We both have truths, are mine the same as yours? (September 2023)
  • Holy Spheres, Batman! (October 2023)
  • Where’s my pneumatic car? (November 2023)
  • Good grief! (December 2023)
  • Cheeky chiplets (January 2024)
  • Cheeky chiplets (February 2024)
  • The Wibbly-Wobbly World of Quantum (March 2024)
  • Techno Talk - Wait! What? Really? (April 2024)
  • Techno Talk - One step closer to a dystopian abyss? (May 2024)
  • Techno Talk - Program that! (June 2024)
  • Techno Talk (July 2024)
  • Techno Talk - That makes so much sense! (August 2024)
  • Techno Talk - I don’t want to be a Norbert... (September 2024)
  • Techno Talk - Sticking the landing (October 2024)
  • Techno Talk (November 2024)
  • Techno Talk (December 2024)
  • Techno Talk (January 2025)
  • Techno Talk (February 2025)
  • Techno Talk (March 2025)
  • Techno Talk (April 2025)
  • Techno Talk (May 2025)
  • Techno Talk (June 2025)
What’s in a name? Techno Talk Mark Nelson This month we check out various names of gadgetry encountered in everyday electronics. Some of them are informative, others silly or even a bit dated (like me!) — but still vaguely amusing in their own way. L et’s kick off with ‘flower power’, dating from the swinging sixties, when we all wore sandals and cheesecloth shirts, with flowers in our hair. Hobby electronics was not a dirt-cheap hobby back then, but transistors were just beginning to become affordable (especially if you bought the cheaper but slightly outof-spec ones). Silicon devices were far too expensive for most folk, so we settled for flower power (in other words germanium) devices. Because many people were not very good at spelling, they wrote ‘geranium’ instead, hence the flower power nickname. Yes, hilariously amusing. In those far-off days, transistor sets were still in the process of ousting the older valve/tube radios. Manufacturers used the trendy term ‘solid state’ to promote the new generation of transistorised products, prompting electronics hobbyists to invent the name ‘hollow state’ for sets that still used round glass things that ran hot. Culpable and colourful capacitors Of course, anything electronic that ran hot was prone to drifting and general unreliability. Many components could not tolerate excessive heat, which is probably how electrolytic capacitors acquired their nickname of ‘smoothing bombs’ (particularly the ones with ominously bulging top seals). Like most electronic components, capacitors use smoke as their active ingredient! If they are overheated or overloaded, they explode and release the smoke that up till then had powered them. This is why you should always conduct a ‘smoke test’ to check whether a newly built or repaired gadget will run for several hours without liberating any smoke. Some folk will tell you that smoke testing is not a silly name invented by electronicists, but rather an entirely rational term borrowed from the plumbing trade. After new pipework has been installed, smoke is created artificially, blown into the tubing, thereby enabling an observer to check the pipes and make sure no smoke is leaking. There may be some 8 truth in this assertion because an alternative name for this exercise is a ‘soak test’, in which newly constructed or repaired equipment is observed under stressful condition over an extended period. Burst pipes would be a clear indication of failure. But we are drifting off-topic, so let’s get back to dodgy capacitors. Highly suspect are the capacitors nicknamed ‘humbugs’, ‘black beauties’ and ‘bumblebees’, which were made in the 1950s – all three being of similar construction. They are notorious for drifting in value or failing to block DC properly, thus contributing to overheated anodes (by putting a false bias on the next stage of amplification) and early valve death in general. Their weak point was a Bakelite resin shell that all too often cracked or crumbled, allowing moisture to enter and degrade the paper dielectric. Humbugs looked strikingly similar to the old-fashioned mint humbug sweet, while bumblebees took their name from the coloured stripes used to indicate their value. Most electronicists replace these caps without bothering to even test them. Far more desirable, both in looks and reliability, were and are the Mullard/Philips C280 miniature metallised metal film capacitors, dating from the mid-1960s. Known universally by their ‘tropical fish’ nickname, they remain highly regarded for their immunity to moisture and temperature drift. Same item, different name Let’s take the humble phono connector – not to be confused with a phone connector of course. Why does such a commonplace item have at least three names in the English language? And why phono? Answering the second question first, it’s a throwback from when owners of radio receivers (wireless sets) could for the first time connect a record deck or electric phonograph. On the rear of these upmarket radios was a small coaxial connector marked ‘phono’ for plugging in the connecting cable. Presumably, this feature originated in the US, where gramophones were called phonographs. Wikipedia confirms this and adds that the connector was launched in 1937 by the RCA company, which explains why most Americans calls these plugs ‘RCA connectors’. On the other hand, many people call them ‘Cinch connectors,’ a term widespread in continental Europe. Historically, the British and US Cinch companies made all manner of connectors, but whether they also made phono connectors I cannot say at this moment. Another classic design of connector with many applications in electronics is the barrel connector, which is a small coaxial connector used for hooking up a low-voltage power source to both consumer electronic devices and a host of industrial products. The (presumably American) author of the Wikipedia page accords it the alternative names of ‘concentric barrel connector’ and ‘tip connector’, but sadly omits the name ‘ROKA connector’, which is used widely in Europe. Why sadly? Because the design of this connector that is now used all over the world originated in Germany and derives from the initials of the Robert Karst electronics company. While we are on this subject, it’s worth noting that conventionally these connectors are centre-positive, but this applies only in consumer electronics. In the US, the reverse applies on professional and industrial equipment, the centre pin being negative. If a gadget using these power connectors appears to be dead even though the power supply is known to be good, the reversed method of wiring may be the cause. Note that the pin of these connectors can measure either 2.1mm or 2.5mm in diameter (2.1mm is more commonplace). A 2.5mm power connector plugged into a device equipped with a 2.1mm pin will not make contact. I once discarded a perfectly good ‘wall wart’ power supply after failing to spot this stupid mistake! One final case of pluggery with multiple names is the mini jack connector, also known as a 3.5mm or 1/8-inch plug or socket. The proper name for the socket is a ‘jack’ and the corresponding ‘plug’ is the proper name for what some folk confusingly call a ‘jack plug’. Practical Electronics | September | 2022