Silicon ChipThe Fox Report - September 2022 SILICON CHIP
  1. Outer Front Cover
  2. Contents
  3. Subscriptions: PE Subscription
  4. Subscriptions
  5. Back Issues: Hare & Forbes Machineryhouse
  6. Publisher's Letter
  7. Feature: What’s in a name? by Mark Nelson
  8. Feature: The Fox Report by Barry Fox
  9. Feature: Net Work by Alan Winstanley
  10. Project: TOUCHSCREEN AND REMOTE DIGITAL PREAMP WITH TONE CONTROLS by NICHOLAS VINEN AND TIM BLYTHMAN
  11. Project: MICROMITE TO SMARTPHONE CONNECTOR VIA BLUETOOTH by TOM HARTLEY
  12. Project: 20A DC Motor Speed Controller by JOHN CLARKE
  13. Project: USB-PD Triggers, Decoys and Testers by Jim Rowe
  14. Feature: Circuit Surgery by Ian Bell
  15. Feature: Make it with Micromite by Phil Boyce
  16. Feature: Max’s Cool Beans by Max the Magnificent
  17. Feature: AUDIO OUT by Jake Rothman
  18. PCB Order Form
  19. Advertising Index

This is only a preview of the September 2022 issue of Practical Electronics.

You can view 0 of the 72 pages in the full issue.

Articles in this series:
  • (November 2020)
  • Techno Talk (December 2020)
  • Techno Talk (January 2021)
  • Techno Talk (February 2021)
  • Techno Talk (March 2021)
  • Techno Talk (April 2021)
  • Techno Talk (May 2021)
  • Techno Talk (June 2021)
  • Techno Talk (July 2021)
  • Techno Talk (August 2021)
  • Techno Talk (September 2021)
  • Techno Talk (October 2021)
  • Techno Talk (November 2021)
  • Techno Talk (December 2021)
  • Communing with nature (January 2022)
  • Should we be worried? (February 2022)
  • How resilient is your lifeline? (March 2022)
  • Go eco, get ethical! (April 2022)
  • From nano to bio (May 2022)
  • Positivity follows the gloom (June 2022)
  • Mixed menu (July 2022)
  • Time for a total rethink? (August 2022)
  • What’s in a name? (September 2022)
  • Forget leaves on the line! (October 2022)
  • Giant Boost for Batteries (December 2022)
  • Raudive Voices Revisited (January 2023)
  • A thousand words (February 2023)
  • It’s handover time (March 2023)
  • AI, Robots, Horticulture and Agriculture (April 2023)
  • Prophecy can be perplexing (May 2023)
  • Technology comes in different shapes and sizes (June 2023)
  • AI and robots – what could possibly go wrong? (July 2023)
  • How long until we’re all out of work? (August 2023)
  • We both have truths, are mine the same as yours? (September 2023)
  • Holy Spheres, Batman! (October 2023)
  • Where’s my pneumatic car? (November 2023)
  • Good grief! (December 2023)
  • Cheeky chiplets (January 2024)
  • Cheeky chiplets (February 2024)
  • The Wibbly-Wobbly World of Quantum (March 2024)
  • Techno Talk - Wait! What? Really? (April 2024)
  • Techno Talk - One step closer to a dystopian abyss? (May 2024)
  • Techno Talk - Program that! (June 2024)
  • Techno Talk (July 2024)
  • Techno Talk - That makes so much sense! (August 2024)
  • Techno Talk - I don’t want to be a Norbert... (September 2024)
  • Techno Talk - Sticking the landing (October 2024)
  • Techno Talk (November 2024)
  • Techno Talk (December 2024)
  • Techno Talk (January 2025)
  • Techno Talk (February 2025)
  • Techno Talk (March 2025)
  • Techno Talk (April 2025)
  • Techno Talk (May 2025)
  • Techno Talk (June 2025)
The Fox Report Barry Fox’s technology column How accurate is smart meter advertising? T his winter – or probably well before then – homes with ‘smart’ meters will discover an unhappy truth. When they took up the offer of a free meter, they gave the gas and electric supply companies freedom to cut off their power remotely, at the flick of a switch (or more likely, the click of a mouse). Unsurprisingly, this doesn’t feature in the power companies’ advertising campaign for smart meters, co-ordinated by a company called Smart Energy GB. All the promotional emphasis is on reducing bills and saving the planet with wind turbines and solar power. Of course, it’s good that customers who could pay their bills but persistently choose not to pay, and try to deny entry to cut-off engineers, will now get their just desserts. But honest victims of unhappy circumstance risk being stuck on Kafkaesque help lines trying to get re-connected. Some may feel they were misled by the power companies’ promotions. Questions will then be asked. Legal, decent, honest and truthful? So, this month, I will distil the essence of countless hours of pressuring the Advertising Standards Authority over the adverts for smart meters it has blessed. I have tried – so far in vain – to interest officialdom. If any bona fide body, with the clout to investigate, now shows genuine interest and concern, I will provide access to chapter and verse documentation. If any reader wants to circulate a copy of this article, for instance to their MP, feel free. I can be contacted via my website: www.tekkiepix.com In November 2021 I complained to the ASA about adverts (eg, Evening Standard, 15 November 2021) which trumpeted that ‘More wind power is a smart thing. Smart meters are helping modernise Britain’s energy system, so it can use more renewables and solar power’. I baulked at the ‘so it can use’ claim. How does the use of smart meters in homes enable wind turbines and solar farms? Smart meters enable the energy companies to save money on human meter-readers, and remotely disconnect supplies. Without evidence or explanation, ‘so it can use’ seems to be a complete non sequitur. Silence isn’t golden The ASA acknowledged receipt of my complaint but then fell silent. This is because the ASA has recently ‘convenienced’ itself – if no one else – by changing its complaint-handling procedure. Anyone complaining about an advert now gets a standard form acknowledgement, but then hears nothing further unless the ASA decides to follow through on the complaint. The complainant is, therefore, left dangling with no information on whether or not their complaint is being followed through, and if not, why not. There is no guidance given on how long a silence signals a considered decision not to act. The ASA acknowledged, 18 months ago, that my, ‘suggestion that we should indicate a likely time frame within our acknowledgement email is something that struck a chord immediately and we will look to implement something like this’. ‘It’s a very helpful suggestion, thank you,’ said a senior spokeswoman. But the last time I looked, the ASA system was still leaving complainants dangling. When I pushed the ASA hard on the lack of action on my smart meter complaint, a senior ASA spokesman explained that it, ‘raised an issue we have already considered, and therefore did not need to pursue further.’ ‘The ASA has previously investigated environmental claims by Smart Energy GB’ the ASA spokesman explained, and pointed to a ruling from September 2019: https://bit.ly/pe-sep22-asa1 ! w e Learn more: hammfg.com/1557 n 1557 IP68 sealed enclosures Contact us to request a free evaluation sample. uksales<at>hammfg.com • 01256 812812 10 Practical Electronics | September | 2022 This said: ‘The ASA Council considered evidence supplied by the advertiser and understood that the data captured and reported by smart meters was intended to help the national grid to anticipate demand and plan energy provision more effectively, with less reliance on fossil fuels. It therefore concluded that the ads did not break the rules’. In early 2022 I reminded the ASA that adverts from Smart Energy GB (Evening Standard, 24 January 2022) were still conflating the fitting of smart home meters with renewable energy sourcing. I warned that the burgeoning energy crisis and likely rash of remote cut-offs could trigger questions on the ASA’s failure to curb the questionable claims. On the one hand… On the face of things, the ASA is not acting on new complaints about smart meter adverts, because it has previously considered and allowed previous adverts. But the older averts were far more cautiously worded than the new adverts. And it is devilishly hard to decode the ASA’s policy on this. Chief Executive Guy Parker points to one ruling, while an ASA spokesman points to different ruling. Guy Parker cites a March 2019 ruling on smart meters as, ‘partly upholding against Smart Energy GB.’ – see: https://bit.ly/pe-sep22-asa2 This ruling flowed from adverts run in mid-2018. 14 people objected to claims that installing gas and electric smart meters in homes saved energy nationwide because people immediately saw how much they were spending. Few people with a meter would argue with this. The meter readout shows red as an oven gets hot, a kettle boils or when a room heater heats. So, the householder becomes more careful. What the ASA didn’t like was a suggestion that the meter itself was saving energy, and the complaint was party upheld. But there had been no attempt at linking meters with wind or solar power. Thus, the March 2019 ruling is a red herring. Separately, an official spokesman for ASA points to a ruling from September 2019 which condoned adverts run in April 2019 that tied meters to cleaner air. But these adverts included a very significant qualification: ‘Smart meters can’t solve climate change on their own, but with the smarter, more energy efficient grid they help to create, they’re a start’. So the complaint Practical Electronics | September | 2022 was not upheld – see: https://bit.ly/pe-sep22-asa1 I have struggled to find similar acknowledgments in more recent adverts which the ASA hasn’t investigated. A senior ASA spokeswoman says it, ‘was not a requirement, as a result of the previous investigation…. to include this as qualifying information in their ads’. This could very well explain why such an honest qualification does not appear in more recent promotions for smart meters. Rising complaints More heavy pushing led the ASA to confirm that since 2014, it has received a total of 180 complaints relating to 21 discrete cases which relate to the role of smart energy meters in the supply of renewable energy. Only one (the one from September 2019 which contained the frank admission that ‘Smart meters can’t solve climate change on their own, but with the smarter, more energy efficient grid they help to create, they’re a start’) was considered to be suitable for formal investigation – but ‘not upheld’. ‘Other cases’ says the ASA ‘were either informally resolved, not investigated after initial assessment because they did not raise any actionable issues or were out of the ASAs remit.’ Presumably mine fell into this hole. For completeness, I also asked the ASA several times whether the Mark Lund named as Chairman of Smart Energy GB (the company behind the smart meter adverts) was the same Mark Lund named as Chairman of the ASA’s funding body ASBOF (The Advertising Standards Board of Finance). I made and make no suggestion of any wrong-doing, I just want to get the optics clear and the facts straight. ASA Chief Executive Guy Parker has now clarified the optics on Mark Lund’s dual role: ‘Mark chairs ASBOF and BASBOF our funding boards. The ASA operates independently and at arms’ length from ASBOF and BASBOF which are responsible for collecting the industry levy/fees from advertisers, online platforms, etc … neither Mark nor any other Board members of ASBOF and BASBOF play any role in the ASA’s decision-making when it comes to apply(ing) the UK Advertising Codes.’ NEW! 5-year collection 2016-2020 All 60 issues from Jan 2016 to Dec 2020 for just £39.95 i files ready or ediate do nload See page 6 for further details and other great back-issue offers. Purchase and download at: www.electronpublishing.com 11