Silicon ChipAUDIO OUT - February 2021 SILICON CHIP
  1. Outer Front Cover
  2. Contents
  3. Subscriptions: PE Subscription
  4. Subscriptions: PicoLog Cloud
  5. Back Issues: PICOLOG
  6. Publisher's Letter
  7. Feature: The Fox Report by Barry Fox
  8. Feature: Techno Talk by Mark Nelson
  9. Feature: Net Work by Alan Winstanley
  10. Project: Remote Monitoring Station by Tim Blythman
  11. Project: Low-distortion DDS Signal Generator by Phil Prosser
  12. Project: INDOOR 'POOR AIR QUALITY' MONITOR by Geoff Graham
  13. Project: USB Logic Analysers by Jim Rowe
  14. Feature: AUDIO OUT
  15. Feature: Circuit Surgery by Ian Bell
  16. Feature: Make it with Micromite
  17. Feature: Practically Speaking by Jake Rothman
  18. Feature: Max’s Cool Beans by Max the Magnificent
  19. Feature: Electronic Building Blocks by Julian Edgar
  20. PCB Order Form
  21. Advertising Index

This is only a preview of the February 2021 issue of Practical Electronics.

You can view 0 of the 72 pages in the full issue.

Articles in this series:
  • (November 2020)
  • Techno Talk (December 2020)
  • Techno Talk (January 2021)
  • Techno Talk (February 2021)
  • Techno Talk (March 2021)
  • Techno Talk (April 2021)
  • Techno Talk (May 2021)
  • Techno Talk (June 2021)
  • Techno Talk (July 2021)
  • Techno Talk (August 2021)
  • Techno Talk (September 2021)
  • Techno Talk (October 2021)
  • Techno Talk (November 2021)
  • Techno Talk (December 2021)
  • Communing with nature (January 2022)
  • Should we be worried? (February 2022)
  • How resilient is your lifeline? (March 2022)
  • Go eco, get ethical! (April 2022)
  • From nano to bio (May 2022)
  • Positivity follows the gloom (June 2022)
  • Mixed menu (July 2022)
  • Time for a total rethink? (August 2022)
  • What’s in a name? (September 2022)
  • Forget leaves on the line! (October 2022)
  • Giant Boost for Batteries (December 2022)
  • Raudive Voices Revisited (January 2023)
  • A thousand words (February 2023)
  • It’s handover time (March 2023)
  • AI, Robots, Horticulture and Agriculture (April 2023)
  • Prophecy can be perplexing (May 2023)
  • Technology comes in different shapes and sizes (June 2023)
  • AI and robots – what could possibly go wrong? (July 2023)
  • How long until we’re all out of work? (August 2023)
  • We both have truths, are mine the same as yours? (September 2023)
  • Holy Spheres, Batman! (October 2023)
  • Where’s my pneumatic car? (November 2023)
  • Good grief! (December 2023)
  • Cheeky chiplets (January 2024)
  • Cheeky chiplets (February 2024)
  • The Wibbly-Wobbly World of Quantum (March 2024)
  • Techno Talk - Wait! What? Really? (April 2024)
  • Techno Talk - One step closer to a dystopian abyss? (May 2024)
  • Techno Talk - Program that! (June 2024)
  • Techno Talk (July 2024)
  • Techno Talk - That makes so much sense! (August 2024)
  • Techno Talk - I don’t want to be a Norbert... (September 2024)
  • Techno Talk - Sticking the landing (October 2024)
  • Techno Talk (November 2024)
  • Techno Talk (December 2024)
  • Techno Talk (January 2025)
  • Techno Talk (February 2025)
  • Techno Talk (March 2025)
  • Techno Talk (April 2025)
  • Techno Talk (May 2025)
  • Techno Talk (June 2025)
AUDIO OUT AUDIO OUT L R By Jake Rothman Theremin Audio Amplifier – Part 4 I n Part 3 last month, we looked at some germanium transistor versions of the PE Theremin Amplifier. This month, we’ll detail the component options and see how the different design strategies performed. Heatsinks For the silicon amplifier, standard clipon heatsinks are adequate. Germanium devices, however, need much more heatsinking. They should run barely warm to obtain a long life. Bolting the devices to the base of a metal box or chassis is sensible. The completed boards and their heatsinking arrangements are shown in Fig.12 and Fig.13. Specifications The gain of both amps was 16.7 (24dB). This is about right for running a radio tuner. For CD use, R1 should be increased to 27kΩ. The germanium amplifier worked down to a supply of 5V while it was about 6.5V for the silicon. Power output As expected, the germanium amplifier gave more power, providing 880mW RMS (7.5Vpk-pk). The silicon circuit gave 720mW (6.5Vpk-pk). This was less than the Siemens circuits because of the addition of an emitter follower (TR2). This stage does allow considerable mismatching of the output transistors due to the low impedance drive. The class-A emitter follower is run at a high current of 17mA to allow for the modest Hfe of germanium and old TO5 silicon devices, which can often be as low as 40. Thus, the total quiescent current is around 20 to 30mA, which precludes most battery operation. The maximum current just clipping was 190mA for the silicon circuit and 220mA for the germanium one. Using a germanium output stage, but with TR1 and TR2 being silicon, gave 810mW (7.2Vpk-pk). As an experiment, the germanium amplifier was found to give 1.32W (6.5Vpk-pk) into 4Ω, but only with good heatsinks. 42 Fig.12. Completed silicon amplifier. Note how bias transistor TR3 is tied to the heatsink of output transistor TR4, providing a degree of thermal stabilisation of the quiescent current. Distortion The crossover glitch was softer and shallower with the germanium output stage and less quiescent current was needed (3mA) to smooth it out. The silicon devices needed around 10mA. With no negative feedback the germanium output stage would in theory produce less distortion. However, the lower open-loop gain of the germanium circuit meant there was less negative feedback factor to reduce distortion. This also gave the effect of softer Fig.13. The completed germanium amplifier. The output transistors must be bolted to sufficient metal to keep them cool, almost at ambient. If this is done, the bias transistor can be left unbolted to the heat sink to track the ambient temperature. Practical Electronics | February | 2021 into this deeper. Interestingly, guitarists are prepared to pay £700 for small germanium amplifiers such as the Deacy amps. I suspect it’s because the lack of clarity exhibited by imperfect amplifiers hides their mistakes! Mix it up n Fig.14. Distortion for the silicon amp: this is at 3Vpk-pk into 8Ω. The best result was obtained with a BC557B silicon input transistor for TR1, while keeping the rest germanium (TR2, 2SA12). The distortion curve for this set-up is shown in Fig.17. Making TR2 silicon made the mid-band distortion a bit worse and gave less output. Leak did the right thing when they replaced the OC44 input transistor with a BC153 in their Stereo 30 amplifier. Bass response The capacitors limit the amplifier’s low-frequency −3dB point to around 65Hz. This is fine for the small paper-coned loudspeakers that are used in low-power applications (guitar practice amplifiers) that typically cut-off around 100Hz. For a true vintage guitar/radio sound I suggest using the Celestion and Philips 4072 units shown in Fig.18. The frequency response of the silicon and germanium amplifiers are shown in Fig.19 and Fig.20. Fig.15. Distortion for the germanium amplifier under the same conditions. It can be seen this is much higher than the silicon amplifier. This is using slow NKT214 transistors for TR1 and TR2. Noise The noise on both circuits was 1mVpk-pk with the input shorted to ground. There was more high-frequency noise in the silicon design and more low-frequency noise in the germanium one. The odd germanium device was very noisy and had to be swapped out from the input stage. Both units worked well as headphone amplifiers. Overload protection The total forward-voltage drop of the short-circuit protection diode network (D1 and D2) needed to be 1V. This was obtained by combining the forward voltage drop of a Zener diode (0.75V) with a germanium diode (0.25V). Fig.16. Using fast 2SA12 RF transistors for TR1 and TR2 improved the distortion of the germanium amplifier. This was a trick Leak used in their Stereo 30 amplifier design. clipping. The loop gain was mainly reduced by the lower value of R2 used on the germanium amplifier to reduce the effect of leakage currents. The result was that the total harmonic distortion was 2.5-times higher in the mid-band (500Hz) and 10-times higher at high frequencies (8kHz) in the germanium amplifier. The audible effect of these differences could be described as the germanium amplifier sounding ‘softer and fuzzier’, with the silicon being ‘clearer but harsher’ when clipped. The germanium amplifier was better for guitar practice and the silicon version for Hi-Fi. The distortion curves are shown in Fig.14 and Fig.15. Practical Electronics | February | 2021 In Fig.16 you can see the effect of using fast 2SA12 transistors for TR1 and TR2, dropping the 10kHz distortion from 1.7% to 0.35%. Technically, the germanium amplifier was ‘less linear’ than the silicon. However, a silicon amplifier with the same level of total harmonic distortion would sound worse because of the higher proportion of high harmonics. In the end, the physics of bipolar transistor action is the same, an exponential voltage-to-current conversion process, whether you use germanium or silicon. It’s the second-order differences which affect the overall results. When I get the spectrum analyser to work we will look Parts list PCB – this is the same board used in the November/December 2020 Audio Out, part AO-1220-01, available from the PE PCB Service at: www.electronpublishing.com Resistors All 0.25W 5% carbon film (silicon amplifier resistors in brackets) R1 R2 R3 R4, R9 R5, R6 R7 R8 4.7kΩ 15kΩ (47kΩ for silicon TR1, such as BC557B) 100kΩ 47Ω 1.5kΩ 220Ω (1kΩ) 160Ω 43 R10, R13 10Ω R11, R12 0.39Ω R14 not used VR1 VR2 500Ω TO5 outline preset 5kΩ TO5 outline preset Capacitors All 10V or higher radial electrolytic unless otherwise stated C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 C8 C9 C10 C11 10µF 100µF 22µF 470µF 100µF 100nF ceramic or polyester 470µF 1000µF not used 33pF ceramic (Not normally used, see text.) 10µF Semiconductors TR1,2 For Ge amp, use small-signal high-frequency PNP germanium OC44, 2SA12, GET872 or audio devices such as OC71, OC75, NKT214; for Si amp, use BC549 TR3 For Ge amp, use AC153, AC128 or any medium-power low-frequency germanium device. A Brimar/Thorn/Mazda AC169 bias transistor can also be used; for Si amp, use BC337 TR4 For Ge amp, use AC153K, AC188 PNP germanium power transistor; for Si amp, use BC138, BC140, BFY51 TO5 medium-power silicon NPN transistors TR5 For Ge amp, use AC176K, AC187 NPN germanium power transistor; for Si amp, use BC143, 2N2905 TO5 medium-power PNP transistors D1 For Ge amp use low-voltage Zener 3.3V to 12V, 400mW; eg, BZY88C5V6; for Si amp use standard high-brightness red LED D2 For Ge amp use germanium small-signal diode; eg, CG92, OA91; for Si amp use BAT86 small Schottky diode Fig.17. A further improvement to the design was to use a BC557B silicon transistor for the input stage TR1 while keeping the rest germanium. TR2 was a 2SA12 device and R2 is 47kΩ. This configuration was the best, producing just 0.045% mid-band distortion. Again, Leak did this as a later mod to the Stereo 30 amplifier. Fig.18. Suitable speakers (available from the author) to complement the germanium transistor amplifier. They are particularly suitable for guitar. Fig.19. Frequency response of the germanium amplifier with slow input transistors (NKT214) and C10 connected. Germanium parts available from the author: Tel 01597 829102 Email jrothman1962<at>gmail.com Why do it? For the audio historian and component obsessive it’s definitely worth the work. It shows 1970s components did the job, and five decades on they are still viable. Fig.20. Frequency response of the silicon amplifier. The germanium amplifiers using fast transistors for TR1 and TR2 gave the same response. 44 Practical Electronics | February | 2021