Silicon ChipThe Fox Report - September 2023 SILICON CHIP
  1. Outer Front Cover
  2. Contents
  3. Subscriptions: PE Subscription
  4. Subscriptions
  5. Back Issues: Hare & Forbes Machineryhouse
  6. Publisher's Letter: Super-accurate analogue clock
  7. Feature: We both have truths, are mine the same as yours? by Max the Magnificent
  8. Feature: The Fox Report by Barry Fox
  9. Feature: Net Work by Alan Winstanley
  10. Project: GPS-Synchronised Analogue Clock by Geoff Graham
  11. Project: MINI LEDRIVER by Tim Blythman
  12. Project: Wide-Range OHMMETER by Phil Prosser
  13. Feature: Make it with Micromite by Phil Boyce
  14. Feature: Max’s Cool Beans by Max the Magnificent
  15. Feature: AUDIO OUT by Jake Rothman
  16. Feature: Circuit Surgery by Ian Bell
  17. Feature: Electronic Building Blocks by Julian Edgar
  18. PCB Order Form
  19. Advertising Index

This is only a preview of the September 2023 issue of Practical Electronics.

You can view 0 of the 72 pages in the full issue.

Articles in this series:
  • (November 2020)
  • Techno Talk (December 2020)
  • Techno Talk (January 2021)
  • Techno Talk (February 2021)
  • Techno Talk (March 2021)
  • Techno Talk (April 2021)
  • Techno Talk (May 2021)
  • Techno Talk (June 2021)
  • Techno Talk (July 2021)
  • Techno Talk (August 2021)
  • Techno Talk (September 2021)
  • Techno Talk (October 2021)
  • Techno Talk (November 2021)
  • Techno Talk (December 2021)
  • Communing with nature (January 2022)
  • Should we be worried? (February 2022)
  • How resilient is your lifeline? (March 2022)
  • Go eco, get ethical! (April 2022)
  • From nano to bio (May 2022)
  • Positivity follows the gloom (June 2022)
  • Mixed menu (July 2022)
  • Time for a total rethink? (August 2022)
  • What’s in a name? (September 2022)
  • Forget leaves on the line! (October 2022)
  • Giant Boost for Batteries (December 2022)
  • Raudive Voices Revisited (January 2023)
  • A thousand words (February 2023)
  • It’s handover time (March 2023)
  • AI, Robots, Horticulture and Agriculture (April 2023)
  • Prophecy can be perplexing (May 2023)
  • Technology comes in different shapes and sizes (June 2023)
  • AI and robots – what could possibly go wrong? (July 2023)
  • How long until we’re all out of work? (August 2023)
  • We both have truths, are mine the same as yours? (September 2023)
  • Holy Spheres, Batman! (October 2023)
  • Where’s my pneumatic car? (November 2023)
  • Good grief! (December 2023)
  • Cheeky chiplets (January 2024)
  • Cheeky chiplets (February 2024)
  • The Wibbly-Wobbly World of Quantum (March 2024)
  • Techno Talk - Wait! What? Really? (April 2024)
  • Techno Talk - One step closer to a dystopian abyss? (May 2024)
  • Techno Talk - Program that! (June 2024)
  • Techno Talk (July 2024)
  • Techno Talk - That makes so much sense! (August 2024)
  • Techno Talk - I don’t want to be a Norbert... (September 2024)
  • Techno Talk - Sticking the landing (October 2024)
  • Techno Talk (November 2024)
  • Techno Talk (December 2024)
  • Techno Talk (January 2025)
  • Techno Talk (February 2025)
  • Techno Talk (March 2025)
  • Techno Talk (April 2025)
  • Techno Talk (May 2025)
  • Techno Talk (June 2025)
The Fox Report Barry Fox’s technology column Cures for online pain and frustration O nline purchasing can be reference number and confirmed in writing that the phoney Royal Mail Tracking Data relied on by eBay ‘should be considered a fraud by false representation as someone has represented they are you to obtain these goods’. So far so good. But when the police tackled Royal Mail, using a dedicated direct crime-stopping contact number (which incidentally Royal Mail only answers on weekdays) the police faced the same roadblock that I as a member of the public had run up against. a painful experience. If something goes wrong, raising a query all too often drops you into unresponsive, unhelpful and obstructive bot-based ‘Help and response’ systems. Last month, I gave an example. This month, I bring some hopeful news of a simple way to bypass or over-fly obstructions. Pass the parcel from eBay As a brief reminder, I bought a £50 bit of electronic kit from an eBay seller (flat price, no auction bidding) which was (allegedly) sent to me by Royal Mail Tracked Delivery. It never arrived. The seller claimed ‘proof of delivery’ in the form of Tracking Data from Royal Mail. But the Data was clearly phoney. There was no address for actual delivery, no photo evidence of delivery and the package had been ‘signed for’ with two different names and scribbles – both fictional. For reasons I have never understood (perhaps due to over-dependence on a bot) eBay accepted the demonstrably fraudulent tracking data as solid proof of delivery, rejected my claim, closed the case and – when I complained – told me (several times) to contact Royal Mail and get Royal Mail to admit failure to deliver. ‘Royal’ Mail As a reminder, Royal Mail has since 2015 been a private company owned by shareholders. Quite how it retains the Royal seal is a mystery. Ofcom recently opened an investigation into Royal Mail’s compliance with its qualityof-service statement. Royal Mail flatly refused to help investigate the phoney ‘proof of delivery’, saying it would not ‘further investigate…. due to the time that’s passed’. In fact, only one week had passed between notifying eBay of goods missing and eBay rejecting my claim and telling me that I ‘must contact Royal Mail’; and only one day 10 had passed between eBay rejecting my claim and my contacting Royal Mail. A full week later Royal Mail was still writing ‘if your item still hasn’t been received’, thereby suggesting that the package might just have been delayed by Royal Mail’s rotten service. Royal Mail showed no interest in the signature fraud and said eBay had ‘misadvised’ in telling me to contact Royal Mail because any queries on tracking data must be made by eBay and the seller. As eBay had already closed the case, and the seller already had my money, there was fat chance of that. Escalation But after (and only after) I filed an Escalated Customer Resolution complaint about Royal Mail’s customer service, a Royal Mail employee grudgingly confirmed – after just short of a month of my nagging – that ‘the GPS attached to the scanning equipment… does indicate that the item has been misdelivered to an incorrect address.’ ‘Due to Data Protection Regulations, (Royal Mail is) unable to disclose the address in question,’ wrote Royal Mail, blaming the now universal legal scapegoat. In the meantime, I used the surprisingly easy-to-use online process for filing a Police Crime Report. To cut a longish story short, police officers visited, spoke to me by phone, emailed for further information, issued a crime Still no help from Royal Mail Royal Mail flatly refused to give the police the address of actual delivery unless the police filed a formal ‘RIPA’ (Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000) request. RIPA governs the use of covert surveillance by public bodies and in practice the police only NEW! 5-year collection 2017-2021 All 60 issues from Jan 2017 to Dec 2021 for just £44.95 PDF files ready for immediate download See page 6 for further details and other great back-issue offers. Purchase and download at: www.electronpublishing.com Practical Electronics | September | 2023 invoke the time-consuming process for serious crimes or thefts. The police could not understand why Royal Mail was insisting on a RIPA and a fifty-quid bit of kit could not justify the time and cost involved. A helpful, and obviously frustrated, police sergeant, explained: ‘If we can move fast and knock on a door, missing parcels have a way of suddenly appearing. But Royal Mail have insisted that there is no way other than RIPA for the police to get the address and investigate the fraud. And it’s now taken so long that the evidence will have gone so the power of arrest will have also gone.’ So, thanks a million Royal Mail for your part in the fight against postal fraud by taking nearly a month to check your GPS proof of fraud and then refusing to share it with the police. Maybe, purely as a probably pointless personal experiment, I will try pursuing Royal Mail through to the Ombusdman. Maybe not. I’ll see how I feel. eBay’s NoReply approach to communication If communicating with Royal Mail over self-evident fraud is frustrating, it can’t hold a candle to communicating with eBay. Even the police found it frustrating. Once the standard ‘where are my goods’ customer procedure has been completed and shut down, eBay sends emails from a NoReply address. The only way (that I could find) then to challenge an eBay email is to wade through an ocean of automated FAQ treacle and use a web form to initiate a completely new enquiry. This is then dealt with by someone fresh to the case. There is no provision (that I could find) to attach photographs or documentary evidence. It would be good if there were a way to complain to the Ombudsman about eBay. And according to eBay there is. The company directs disgruntled customers to the Financial Services Ombudsman – see: https://bit.ly/pe-sep23-ebay Not so, says the FOS, ‘We are a free service set up to resolve disputes with financial businesses, like banks or insurance companies… and it doesn’t appear your complaint is one we can help with.’ Since I had escalated my complaint to Royal Mail and finally squeezed out written admission of delivery to a wrong address, I was able to file that also as evidence. Moral #2: if Royal Mail Customer Help is unhelpful, use the escalation option. So far, the money remains in my account and like a plaintiff in court I can now only wait to see whether and how eBay and the phoney-proof-parroting seller respond to the shed load of evidence I sent the card company, and what the credit card ‘jury’ decide on where my £50 should finally come to rest. Regardless of the outcome, I already know one thing for sure. I shall think very carefully indeed before I ever again buy anything costing more than a few quid through eBay, or buy anything from anyone who wants to send it by Royal Mail Tracked Delivery. …and finally Last, here’s one other practical tip. All today’s complaints and claim services will usually have a tight limit on the number of text characters that can be submitted as a description of the complaint. If they allow photo or documentary evidence to be filed there will usually be restrictions on the file format and size accepted. This may well not be clearly stated in advance. So ahead of starting on the claim or complaint trail, draft a tight statement of fact with all the most relevant dates and events clearly set out. Also, collect and collate all the evidence, ideally as widely accepted jpeg and pdf files. It will then be (relatively) easy to trim the word length and re-size files to comply with whatever online strictures pop up. As any writer knows, editing down facts is always easier than adding and expanding them. Chargeback Fortunately, there is still one near-magic way to bypass eBay’s obstructions. It’s called Chargeback and it’s a service offered by the credit card companies. Essentially, if you have paid for goods or services with your credit card and something has gone wrong, you can use the credit card company’s online system to claim back the payment made from the card. If the credit card company agrees that you have been done down, it will claw back the cash. Chargeback will usually, initially, be only temporary, though. If the other side contests the claim, the credit card company will ask for more evidence and evaluate it. But this evidence can be sent by email, with evidence attached. The big glory of the Chargeback process is that there is no longer any need for the customer to try and deal directly with eBay and its deliberately evasive NoReply mail system. In my case, my card company temporarily clawed back my money from eBay. The eBay seller then responded by simply parroting his original reliance on the Royal Mail Tracking Data that I had repeatedly shown to be phoney. Because I had filed a crime report I was able to show evidence quoting the police crime reference number and police letter deeming the signatures to be fraudulent. Moral: if you have been burned online, file a crime report, if only for the Crime Reference number. Practical Electronics | September | 2023 JTAG Connector Plugs Directly into PCB!! No Header! No Brainer! Our patented range of Plug-of-Nails™ spring-pin cables plug directly into a tiny footprint of pads and locating holes in your PCB, eliminating the need for a mating header. Save Cost & Space on Every PCB!! Solutions for: PIC . dsPIC . ARM . MSP430 . Atmel . Generic JTAG . Altera Xilinx . BDM . C2000 . SPY-BI-WIRE . SPI / IIC . Altium Mini-HDMI . & More www.PlugOfNails.com Tag-Connector footprints as small as 0.02 sq. inch (0.13 sq cm) 11