Silicon ChipThe Fox Report - February 2023 SILICON CHIP
  1. Outer Front Cover
  2. Contents
  3. Subscriptions: PE Subscription
  4. Subscriptions
  5. Back Issues: Hare & Forbes Machineryhouse
  6. Publisher's Letter: What is it about Tesla?
  7. Feature: A thousand words by Mark Nelson
  8. Feature: The Fox Report by Barry Fox
  9. Feature: Net Work by Alan Winstanley
  10. Project: Solid-State Flame Discharge by Flavio Spedalieri
  11. Project: Cooling Fan Controller & Loudspeaker Protector by John Clarke
  12. Project: Driveway Gate Remote Control by Dr Hugo Holden
  13. Project: Geekcreit’s LTDZ V5.0 Spectrum Analyser by Jim Rowe
  14. Feature: KickStart by Mike Tooley
  15. Feature: Make it with Micromite by Phil Boyce
  16. Feature: Circuit Surgery by Ian Bell
  17. Feature: Max’s Cool Beans by Max the Magnificent
  18. PCB Order Form
  19. Advertising Index

This is only a preview of the February 2023 issue of Practical Electronics.

You can view 0 of the 72 pages in the full issue.

Articles in this series:
  • (November 2020)
  • Techno Talk (December 2020)
  • Techno Talk (January 2021)
  • Techno Talk (February 2021)
  • Techno Talk (March 2021)
  • Techno Talk (April 2021)
  • Techno Talk (May 2021)
  • Techno Talk (June 2021)
  • Techno Talk (July 2021)
  • Techno Talk (August 2021)
  • Techno Talk (September 2021)
  • Techno Talk (October 2021)
  • Techno Talk (November 2021)
  • Techno Talk (December 2021)
  • Communing with nature (January 2022)
  • Should we be worried? (February 2022)
  • How resilient is your lifeline? (March 2022)
  • Go eco, get ethical! (April 2022)
  • From nano to bio (May 2022)
  • Positivity follows the gloom (June 2022)
  • Mixed menu (July 2022)
  • Time for a total rethink? (August 2022)
  • What’s in a name? (September 2022)
  • Forget leaves on the line! (October 2022)
  • Giant Boost for Batteries (December 2022)
  • Raudive Voices Revisited (January 2023)
  • A thousand words (February 2023)
  • It’s handover time (March 2023)
  • AI, Robots, Horticulture and Agriculture (April 2023)
  • Prophecy can be perplexing (May 2023)
  • Technology comes in different shapes and sizes (June 2023)
  • AI and robots – what could possibly go wrong? (July 2023)
  • How long until we’re all out of work? (August 2023)
  • We both have truths, are mine the same as yours? (September 2023)
  • Holy Spheres, Batman! (October 2023)
  • Where’s my pneumatic car? (November 2023)
  • Good grief! (December 2023)
  • Cheeky chiplets (January 2024)
  • Cheeky chiplets (February 2024)
  • The Wibbly-Wobbly World of Quantum (March 2024)
  • Techno Talk - Wait! What? Really? (April 2024)
  • Techno Talk - One step closer to a dystopian abyss? (May 2024)
  • Techno Talk - Program that! (June 2024)
  • Techno Talk (July 2024)
  • Techno Talk - That makes so much sense! (August 2024)
  • Techno Talk - I don’t want to be a Norbert... (September 2024)
  • Techno Talk - Sticking the landing (October 2024)
  • Techno Talk (November 2024)
  • Techno Talk (December 2024)
  • Techno Talk (January 2025)
  • Techno Talk (February 2025)
  • Techno Talk (March 2025)
  • Techno Talk (April 2025)
  • Techno Talk (May 2025)
  • Techno Talk (June 2025)
The Fox Report Barry Fox’s technology column Paying the price for not buying a TV licence E veryone (in the UK) has their own view of the BBC Licence Fee – who should pay and how much, if anything (see box below). My personal view of the Beeb’s budgeting is coloured by years of doing freelance work at pittance pay for unfortunate programme producers who were starved of the budget they needed to do a good job – while broadcast stars and corporation managers were overtly overpaid. One early January I was in a lift at Broadcasting House when one ‘suit’ commiserated with another: ‘I expect you’ve come back to a pile of problems’. ‘No problem,’ said the senior suit. ‘I’ll just sort through it and delegate’. But the law is the law – until it changes – and in theory, anyone of any age or gender not destitute and not buying a licence and watching TV content on any device can end up locked up. So, are people actually going to jail for watching but not paying? I was recently inside a women’s prison, HMP Bronzefield in Ashford, Middlesex. I go there for live theatre and musical events staged for charity inside prisons by the enterprising Grange Park Pimlico Opera group. Previous productions have included Our House and Sweet Charity. This time it was Betty Blue Eyes, the musical comedy derived from Alan Bennett’s film A Private Function. A core cast of professional actors and musicians perform with a group of prisoners, auditioned and rehearsed by Funding the BBC The BBC is funded via a non-optional, paid-for licence for anyone watching any TV programme – not just one from the BBC. It is a form of ‘quasi-taxation’. For further details, see the Wiki page: https://bit.ly/pe-feb23-beeb 1551W IP68 miniature enclosures the professional producers. Set design, sound and lighting design is top notch. It’s an all-round good enterprise. After the performance, the deputy director, gave a speech in which she referred to the disproportionately high numbers of women in prison for not having TV licences. Is it really the case that many more women than men are in prison for not buying a TV licence, I asked her after her speech? Yes, she assured. So, I did some independent digging. To be accurate, people can go to jail for not paying fines imposed for not having a licence, but not for not having a licence per se. And more women are prosecuted because they are more likely to be at home and open the door to an inspector during the day. Even if they are at home, men are less obliging. Most important, the government’s Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) released an ! w ne Learn more: hammfg.com/1551w Contact us to request a free evaluation sample. uksales<at>hammfg.com 01256 812812 10 Practical Electronics | February | 2023 official statement in January 2021 which clearly says: ‘As of 30 June 2020, there were zero people in prison for failing to pay the fine in respect of the non-payment of a TV licence in England and Wales.’ Does this mean that over the last couple of years, largely during Covid lockdown, women have been imprisoned for TV licence evasion? I asked both the prison director and her deputy director, who made the claim, to clarify. After a month and reminders neither has responded. But I shall try asking them both again, especially as the DCMS has now confirmed, unequivocally: ‘There is no one currently in prison as a result of not paying fines for not having a TV licence. ‘The penalty for TV licence evasion is a fine. Imprisonment is pursued rarely and only as a matter of last resort for those wilfully refusing to pay the fine or culpably neglecting to pay. The courts will do everything within their powers to trace those who do not pay and use a variety of means to ensure the recovery of criminal fines and financial penalties. In 2020 and 2021, there were no admissions into prison associated with failing to pay a fine in respect of the non-payment of a TV licence in England and Wales.’ The DCMS spokesman added: ‘The BBC’s funding model is facing challenges and it is right that we examine the future of the licence fee. The way people consume media has changed radically since the licence fee was introduced. The DCMS Secretary of State has been clear she will decide policy based on the evidence and the government, as we have committed to, will carry out a review of the licence fee funding model ahead of the next Charter period.’ Horrific? A fun footnote: The obviously peeved Grange Park producers of the show I saw had been forced to cancel a longplanned production of The Little Shop of Horrors (a comedy about a maneating plant) because – to quote the producers – ‘the Ministry of Justice / Prison Service suddenly decided at a very late stage that the title was too sensitive, despite having known about our plans for the production for months.’ Theatre, movie and book buffs will of course know that the short-notice replacement, Betty Blue Eyes, has fun with a criminal scheme to break the strict rationing laws in force in Britain after WW2, centring on plans to brutally kill a pet pig with a hammer. But this is not ‘sensitive’, it seems. NEW! 5-year collection 2017-2021 All 60 issues from Jan 2017 to Dec 2021 for just £44.95 PDF files ready for immediate download See page 6 for further details and other great back-issue offers. Purchase and download at: www.electronpublishing.com tekkiepix pic of the month – Compusonics digital recording The Compusonics Studio DSP-2000 Series was billed as, ‘The world’s first super-micro, multi-processor computer configured as a single-user workstation for audio mixing and recording of live music in a variety of digital formats.’ E ver heard of Compusonics, the company that offered floppy disc recording long anyone dreamt of MP3? In June 1984, US company Compusonics announced a digital audio recorder which stored 45 minutes of stereo on a 5.25-inch computer floppy Practical Electronics | February | 2023 disc. But for two years Compusonics booths at electronics shows were always not quite ready for demonstration that day. Compusonics also promised a digital video version. The first working model was shown at the National Association of Broadcasters Convention in Dallas in 1986. The computer player cost US$3,000 and played four minutes of stereo or eight minutes of mono. Sound quality was poor and the player stuck and skipped. The video version could only manage a couple of coarse pictures per second. President David Schwartz hired investment bankers Blinder, Robinson and Co of Colorado, who provided potential investors with a prospectus complete with some 40 press clippings. BBC TV’s Tomorrow’s World ran the story, and British company Ferrograph planned to badge a Compusonics professional recorder for £4,000 in September 1986. However, it was not to be, and Compusonics is now forgotten, but recording sound and pictures on computer is now commonplace and dirt cheap. Others reaped the rewards from a great idea that was ahead of its time. Practical Electronics is delighted to be able to help promote Barry Fox’s project to preserve the visual history of preInternet electronics. Visit www.tekkiepix.com for fascinating stories and a chance to support this unique online collection. 11