Silicon ChipCalibrated MEMS Microphones - April 2025 SILICON CHIP
  1. Contents
  2. Publisher's Letter: Equivalent Series Resistance testers are very useful
  3. Feature: Net Work by Alan Winstanley
  4. Feature: Max’s Cool Beans by Max the Magnificent
  5. Project: Calibrated MEMS Microphones by Phil Prosser
  6. Feature: The History of Electronics, part four by Dr David Maddison
  7. Subscriptions
  8. Feature: Circuit Surgery by Ian Bell
  9. Feature: The Fox Report by Barry Fox
  10. Project: ESR Test Tweezers by Tim Blythman
  11. Feature: Audio Out by Jake Rothman
  12. Feature: Techno Talk by Max the Magnificent
  13. Back Issues
  14. Project: Low-Noise Mains Fan Speed Controller, Mk2 by John Clarke
  15. Feature: Precision Electronics, part four by Andrew Levido
  16. PartShop
  17. Market Centre
  18. Advertising Index
  19. Back Issues

This is only a preview of the April 2025 issue of Practical Electronics.

You can view 0 of the 80 pages in the full issue.

Articles in this series:
  • Win a Microchip Explorer 8 Development Kit (April 2024)
  • Net Work (May 2024)
  • Net Work (June 2024)
  • Net Work (July 2024)
  • Net Work (August 2024)
  • Net Work (September 2024)
  • Net Work (October 2024)
  • Net Work (November 2024)
  • Net Work (December 2024)
  • Net Work (January 2025)
  • Net Work (February 2025)
  • Net Work (March 2025)
  • Net Work (April 2025)
Articles in this series:
  • Max’s Cool Beans (January 2025)
  • Max’s Cool Beans (February 2025)
  • Max’s Cool Beans (March 2025)
  • Max’s Cool Beans (April 2025)
  • Max’s Cool Beans (May 2025)
  • Max’s Cool Beans (June 2025)
Articles in this series:
  • The History of Electronics, Pt1 (October 2023)
  • The History of Electronics, Pt2 (November 2023)
  • The History of Electronics, Pt3 (December 2023)
  • The History of Electronics, part one (January 2025)
  • The History of Electronics, part two (February 2025)
  • The History of Electronics, part three (March 2025)
  • The History of Electronics, part four (April 2025)
  • The History of Electronics, part five (May 2025)
  • The History of Electronics, part six (June 2025)
Articles in this series:
  • Circuit Surgery (April 2024)
  • STEWART OF READING (April 2024)
  • Circuit Surgery (May 2024)
  • Circuit Surgery (June 2024)
  • Circuit Surgery (July 2024)
  • Circuit Surgery (August 2024)
  • Circuit Surgery (September 2024)
  • Circuit Surgery (October 2024)
  • Circuit Surgery (November 2024)
  • Circuit Surgery (December 2024)
  • Circuit Surgery (January 2025)
  • Circuit Surgery (February 2025)
  • Circuit Surgery (March 2025)
  • Circuit Surgery (April 2025)
  • Circuit Surgery (May 2025)
  • Circuit Surgery (June 2025)
Articles in this series:
  • The Fox Report (July 2024)
  • The Fox Report (September 2024)
  • The Fox Report (October 2024)
  • The Fox Report (November 2024)
  • The Fox Report (December 2024)
  • The Fox Report (January 2025)
  • The Fox Report (February 2025)
  • The Fox Report (March 2025)
  • The Fox Report (April 2025)
  • The Fox Report (May 2025)
Articles in this series:
  • Audio Out (January 2024)
  • Audio Out (February 2024)
  • AUDIO OUT (April 2024)
  • Audio Out (May 2024)
  • Audio Out (June 2024)
  • Audio Out (July 2024)
  • Audio Out (August 2024)
  • Audio Out (September 2024)
  • Audio Out (October 2024)
  • Audio Out (March 2025)
  • Audio Out (April 2025)
  • Audio Out (May 2025)
  • Audio Out (June 2025)
Articles in this series:
  • (November 2020)
  • Techno Talk (December 2020)
  • Techno Talk (January 2021)
  • Techno Talk (February 2021)
  • Techno Talk (March 2021)
  • Techno Talk (April 2021)
  • Techno Talk (May 2021)
  • Techno Talk (June 2021)
  • Techno Talk (July 2021)
  • Techno Talk (August 2021)
  • Techno Talk (September 2021)
  • Techno Talk (October 2021)
  • Techno Talk (November 2021)
  • Techno Talk (December 2021)
  • Communing with nature (January 2022)
  • Should we be worried? (February 2022)
  • How resilient is your lifeline? (March 2022)
  • Go eco, get ethical! (April 2022)
  • From nano to bio (May 2022)
  • Positivity follows the gloom (June 2022)
  • Mixed menu (July 2022)
  • Time for a total rethink? (August 2022)
  • What’s in a name? (September 2022)
  • Forget leaves on the line! (October 2022)
  • Giant Boost for Batteries (December 2022)
  • Raudive Voices Revisited (January 2023)
  • A thousand words (February 2023)
  • It’s handover time (March 2023)
  • AI, Robots, Horticulture and Agriculture (April 2023)
  • Prophecy can be perplexing (May 2023)
  • Technology comes in different shapes and sizes (June 2023)
  • AI and robots – what could possibly go wrong? (July 2023)
  • How long until we’re all out of work? (August 2023)
  • We both have truths, are mine the same as yours? (September 2023)
  • Holy Spheres, Batman! (October 2023)
  • Where’s my pneumatic car? (November 2023)
  • Good grief! (December 2023)
  • Cheeky chiplets (January 2024)
  • Cheeky chiplets (February 2024)
  • The Wibbly-Wobbly World of Quantum (March 2024)
  • Techno Talk - Wait! What? Really? (April 2024)
  • Techno Talk - One step closer to a dystopian abyss? (May 2024)
  • Techno Talk - Program that! (June 2024)
  • Techno Talk (July 2024)
  • Techno Talk - That makes so much sense! (August 2024)
  • Techno Talk - I don’t want to be a Norbert... (September 2024)
  • Techno Talk - Sticking the landing (October 2024)
  • Techno Talk (November 2024)
  • Techno Talk (December 2024)
  • Techno Talk (January 2025)
  • Techno Talk (February 2025)
  • Techno Talk (March 2025)
  • Techno Talk (April 2025)
  • Techno Talk (May 2025)
  • Techno Talk (June 2025)
Articles in this series:
  • Precision Electronics, Part 1 (November 2024)
  • Precision Electronics, Part 2 (December 2024)
  • Precision Electronics, part one (January 2025)
  • Precision Electronics, Part 3 (January 2025)
  • Precision Electronics, part two (February 2025)
  • Precision Electronics, Part 4 (February 2025)
  • Precision Electronics, Part 5 (March 2025)
  • Precision Electronics, part three (March 2025)
  • Precision Electronics, part four (April 2025)
  • Precision Electronics, Part 6 (April 2025)
  • Precision Electronics, Part 7: ADCs (May 2025)
  • Precision Electronics, part five (May 2025)
  • Precision Electronics, part six (June 2025)
MEMS Calibrated Microphones Using a MEMS Microphone as a Reference Microphone by Phil Prosser MEMS (micro-electromechanical system) microphones have advantages over electret mics, such as operating at ultrasonic frequencies. They also have good frequency response characteristics, so you can use them as reference microphones, as described in this article. W e r e c e i ve d s o m e K n ow l e s SPU0410LR5H MEMS microphone elements from a kind reader named Richard Stone. They were sent to determine their suitability for use as calibrated microphones. That was prompted by our Calibrated Measurement Mic project that was published in the September 2024 issue. It used inexpensive electret capsule microphones (ECMs). It used compensation and calibration to provide a flat frequency response, allowing those microphones to be used as measurement devices, eg, to plot the frequency response of a loudspeaker. The MEMS microphones we received are tiny (3.76 × 2.95mm) and connect to a PCB via under-chip pads. They also require a hole in the PCB that’s used as the aperture for the microphone, so they must be soldered to a PCB designed explicitly for them. Soldering them would be tricky for most of our readers. They are surprisingly inexpensive at only around $1 each (less in quantity). Happily, it turns out that you can buy these microphones already assembled to a board from TeensyBat: https://pemag.au/link/abt5 That is just one example; there are quite a few suppliers of similar ‘carrier boards’. The ones we tested came mounted on 7mm circular PCBs. The Knowles MEMS microphone needs a 1.5-3.6V DC power supply and provides an AC output. As a result, they can be connected to our Calibrated Microphone board but some minor modifications are required. These involve adding a 3.3kW series resistor and 3.3V zener across the microphone power supply to obtain a suitable voltage, as shown in the revised circuit diagram, Fig.1. To do this on the SMD version of the PCB, you have to cut the track between capacitor C6 (10μF) and resistor R4 (100kW), which is small but not too fiddly. This is shown in Fig.2, along with the added 3.3kW resistor and microphone wiring. If using an SMD resistor, it can be soldered across the pads spanning the cut location, although adding a miniature through-hole resistor, as shown, is easier. The equivalent changes for the through-hole version of the PCB are shown in Fig.3. In both cases, the rear of the 7mm round microphone PCB mentioned above is illustrated for the wiring. However, you might prefer to route the wires from the Fig.1: the changes required to the original Calibrated Microphone preamp circuit are minimal. R8, R14 and the four compensation components are not fitted, a 3.3kW resistor replaces the track between pin 1 of CON2 and the 10μF capacitor, and a 3.3V zener across pins 1 and 3 of CON2 limits the microphone’s supply voltage to a safe level. Practical Electronics | April | 2025 19 Constructional Project Fig.2: this shows how to assemble the SMD version of the PCB and wire it up to the MEMS microphone. The through-hole 3.3kW resistor shown could be replaced with an SMD resistor across the cut section of track (soldered on top of the leads of the other components). Your microphone board might differ from the one shown here, so be careful to wire it up correctly. Fig.3: as with the SMD version, several components are left off the through-hole version of the PCB, one track is cut and a resistor and zener diode are added. Note how the striped end of the extra zener diode goes to the positive (supply) terminal of CON2. other side to keep the area with the sensing hole clear. The pads labelled “G” are ground, “O” is the output and “+” is the positive supply. Note that while both of our boards have mounting locations for frequency compensation parts (two resistors and two capacitors), we leave them off for this microphone as it does not require compensation. The MEMS microphone connected this way works a treat. The resulting ‘calibration curve’ is shown in Fig.4. The cyan curve is the frequency response of this microphone, while the Dayton EMM-6 reference mic we used for the original project is in red. The calibration data we have for the Dayton unit only runs from 20-20000Hz, so I cut the measurements off there. Note that the speaker used for this test was rolling off in its response at low frequencies, so the measurements are noisy down low. The measured response is entirely consistent with published data. The MEMS microphone’s output level is much higher than the Dayton microphone, and per the data sheet, the SPL (sound pressure level) limit is not that high, so you will be limited in making near-field measurements or dealing with high SPLs. In terms of calibration, if you only want to measure up to 10kHz, you can probably ignore the calibration Fig.4: the raw frequency response of the Knowles MEMS microphone (blue) compared to the reference Dayton EMM-6 (red). The Knowles response is very close to what’s stated in their data sheet. The thinner, dashed red curve is the Dayton curve shifted up to make it easier to compare to the Knowles curve. 20 Practical Electronics | April | 2025 MEMS Calibrated Microphones Scope 1 (left): the MEMS microphone picks up 22kHz sound waves just fine. According to the data sheet, it will work up to at least 80kHz. The sensitivity drops off above about 25kHz, but it will definitely still pick up signals above that. Photo 1: this MEMS microphone has a footprint under 4 × 3mm and picks up sound via the small ‘acoustic port’ hole in the base. You can see how the pad arrangement makes it tricky to solder; the only practical method is reflow (IR or hot air). file or make one by taking data from the published curves. In my opinion, the critical frequency response areas are in your crossover zones, typically in the 100-5000Hz region, making these microphones an interesting option if you are OK fiddling with tiny ICs. Richard was interested in using them to measure the output of ultrasonic parking sensors. The only ul- trasonic source I knew I had was an old-school remote from the 1960s, in which the ‘buttons’ make springloaded hammers tap brass rods. The resulting ultrasonic signals were picked up by the TV set. It was an unusual arrangement! I used this circuit to measure the output of that remote control, with the result shown in Scope 1. The two buttons generate high frequencies at relatively high levels; the one shown in Scope 1 is at 22kHz. That is above the range of human hearing, although it might freak out your dog or cat! The bursts are short, so if you could hear them, it would be as a click. So, as far as I can see, these are a real option for ultrasonic measurements. They are also pretty good for use as a basic calibrated microphone over the PE audible frequency range. Parts List – MEMS Reference Microphone SMD version Through-hole version 1 double-sided PCB coded 01108231, 64 × 13mm 1 Knowles SPU0410LR5H MEMS microphone on carrier PCB Semiconductors 2 BC860 45V 100mA PNP transistors, SOT-23 (Q1, Q2) 1 BC849C 30V 100mA NPN transistor, SOT-23 (Q3) 3 6.8V ¼W zener diodes, SOT-23 (ZD1-ZD3) [BZX84C6V8] 1 3.3V 0.6-1W axial zener diode (ZD4) [1N4728] Capacitors (M2012/0805 50V X7R, unless otherwise noted) 1 100μF 50V radial electrolytic (max 8mm diameter) 1 100μF 10V low-ESR radial electrolytic 1 10μF 16V X5R 3 1μF 50V non-polarised SMD electrolytics, no more than 4mm in diameter 2 2.2nF 5% NP0/C0G 2 1nF 5% NP0/C0G 2 470pF 5% NP0/C0G Resistors (all SMD M2012/0805 size 1%, unless noted) 1 100kW 1 39kW 1 5.6kW 2 150kW 1 1kW 1 330W 2 47W 1 2.2kW 1 3.3kW (through-hole or SMD, 1/4W 1%) 1 double-sided PCB coded 01108232, 99 × 13mm 1 Knowles SPU0410LR5H MEMS microphone on carrier PCB Semiconductors 2 BC560 45V 100mA PNP transistors, TO-92 (Q1, Q2) 1 BC549C 30V 100mA NPN transistor, TO-92 (Q3) 3 6.8V 400mW or 1W axial zener diodes (ZD1-ZD3) [1N754] 1 3.3V 0.6-1W axial zener diode (ZD4) [1N4728] Capacitors 1 100μF 50V radial electrolytic (maximum 8mm diameter) 1 100μF 10V low-ESR radial electrolytic 1 10μF 35V radial electrolytic 3 1μF 63V/100V MKT 2 2.2nF 63V/100V MKT 2 1nF 63V/100V MKT 2 470pF 50V C0G/NP0 ceramic Resistors (all axial 1/4W 1%) 1 100kW 1 39kW 1 5.6kW 2 150kW 1 2.2kW 1 1kW 1 330W 1 3.3kW 2 47W This is an updated version of the parts list from the September 2024 issue. In short, the changes were the addition of the SPU0410LR5H MEMS microphone, 3.3V zener diode, 3.3kW resistor; and the removal of one each of the 10kW and 2.2kW resistors. The case parts are not included; see the September 2024 issue for those. Practical Electronics | April | 2025 21